Cannabis use compared to speeding.

PICO Qiestion: How does cannabis use compared to speeding affect the number of motor vehicle fatalities among males under 25?

After completing 500 clinical hours, students undoubtedly witness problems or gaps in healthcare. The PICO question Population/ Patient Problem: (P), Intervention: (I), Comparison: (C), Outcome: (O) is to ask a searchable and answerable question that provides evidence to improve practice. In a well-written discussion post address, the following:

• Describe a real-world, current problem in US psychiatric care. This could be a problem that affects clinical decisions and may include a broad range of biological, psychological, and sociological issues.
• Formulate a PICO question based on the question chosen in the announcement. You will use this question in each discussion for this term.
• Summarize the reason this PICO question is so important to advanced practice nursing.

Cannabis use compared to speeding.

Submission Instructions:

• Your initial post should be at least 700 words, formatted and cited in the current APA style.
• Provide support for your work from at least five academic sources less than 5 years old.Visit Purdue Owl for specific examples on how to create in-text citations and cite references using the current APA format.
• Students will use this PICO question when creating the abstract and academic poster
• Follow-up the Rubric to get the maximum points.

For all your nursing and medical task, one of our nursing experts is available to work on your soap notes, medical evaluation discussions, and pharmacology.

•  
• Grading Rubric

• ---

  Your assignment will be graded according to the grading rubric.

  Discussion Rubric
  Criteria	Ratings	Points
  Identification of Main Issues, Problems, and Concepts	Distinguished – 4 points Post is substantively accurate. Identifies and demonstrates a sophisticated understanding of the issues, problems, and concepts surrounding the assignment. Provides exceptional and thought-provoking analysis that directly addresses details and/or examples of the main topic.	Excellent – 3 points Post is mostly related to the topic. Demonstrates understanding of most of the issues, problems, and concepts surrounding the assignment. It provides some supporting details and/or examples. Analyses not as clear as they could be.	Fair – 1-2 points Demonstrates limited understanding of most of the issues, problems, and concepts surrounding the assignment. No details and/or examples are given.	Poor – 0 points Post is off-topic, incorrect and/or irrelevant to the issues, problems, and concepts surrounding the assignment. Analyses are not well organized or clear.	4 points
  APA Formatting Guidelines	Distinguished – 2 points The reference page contains at least the required current scholarly academic reference and text reference. Follows APA guidelines of components: double space, 12 pt. font, abstract, level headings, hanging indent, and in-text citations.	Excellent – 1 point The reference page contains one current scholarly academic resource and text reference. Follows most APA guidelines of components: double space, 12 pt. font, abstract, level headings, hanging indent, and in-text citations.	Fair – 0.5 points The reference page contains one current or outdated scholarly academic resource. Many errors of APA guidelines: double space, 12 pt. font, abstract, level headings, hanging indent, and in-text citations.	Poor – 0 points The reference page contains no current scholarly academic resources, only internet web pages, or no reference page. Lack of APA guidelines for references provided or in-text citations.	2 points
  Writing Mechanics	Distinguished – 2 points Rules of grammar, usage, and punctuation are followed; spelling is correct.	Excellent – 1 point Few grammatical errors, but sentences could be clearer and more precise.	Fair – 0.5 points The paper contains a few grammatical, punctuation, and spelling errors.	Poor – 0 points The paper contains numerous grammatical, punctuation, and spelling errors.	2 points
  Response to Posts of Peers	Distinguished – 2 points Constructively responded to two other posts and either extended, expanded, or provided a rebuttal to each.	Fair – 1 point Constructively responded to one other post and either extended, expanded, or provided a rebuttal.	Poor – 0 points Provided no response to a peer’s post.	2 points
  Total Points	10